politics

  • A profile on Rachel Maddow, who just got her own show on MSNBC, and is one of my favorite news personalities. Watching her go head-to-head with Pat Buchanan on MSNBC has been the highlight of the Democratic convention for me.
    Unlike Olbermann, Maddow plans to interview some conservative guests. But she is determined to avoid the left-right pairings that sustain much of cable news. "It creates fake balance," she says. "I'm sorry -- we're going to have a debate about whether or not the Earth is flat? It doesn't make sense to have a debate about whether offshore drilling is going to bring down gas prices. You know what? It's not. The fact that it's false ought to be reported, or you're advancing a lie."
    (0) #
    8/27/2008
  • Obama's vice presidential selection is looming, so I'm going to throw this one out there: could Richard Clarke be his dark horse pick?


    Update: It turns out it's the more famous older white guy with foreign policy experience. Biden will be fun to watch in the VP debate. (5) #
    8/21/2008

Edwards: A Brief Editorial

I am not upset or mad at Edwards for having the affair -- it is his business, and between him and his family. However, I am extremely pissed off at him for running for President after having the affair, particularly because infidelity issues have in the past hurt the Democratic party to the point of arguably getting Bush elected. What an egomaniacal dick, to run for president when the stakes are so high.

Fri, 08/08/2008 - 5:57pm
  • Lessig: what Ted Stevens did is wrong, but it isn't that much different than the way campaign contributions work.
    [W]hile it is a crime for VECO Corporation to pay to have Stevens' house renovated, there's no problem with VECO's PAC and senior executives giving Stevens' campaign many times more than that which Stevens' is then free to use to fly to a resort in Montana, or entertain senior executives at DC's most expensive restaurants.
    (5) #
    7/31/2008
  • Here's an excellent and simple graph comparing the differences between Obama's and McCain's tax proposals. Kevin Drum comments:
    Bottom line: If you're really rich and think that George Bush's tax cuts for the rich didn't go nearly far enough, John McCain is your man.
    (43) #
    6/12/2008
  • These are all anonymous quotes from insiders of the Clinton campaign:
    -Hillary assembled a team thin on presidential campaign experience that confused discipline with insularity...
    -There was financial mismanagement bordering on fraud.
    -Her people spent all of 2008 making lists blaming each other (but never themselves) rather than lists of solutions.
    There are a lot more like that in the article. It makes me feel extremely glad that this team is unlikely to be running the White House in one year's time. (3) #
    5/16/2008
  • Josh Marshall has a fascinating post about why Obama has done so poorly in West Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and the surrounding areas:
    There's been a lot of talk in this campaign about Barack Obama's problem with working class white voters or rural voters. But these claims are both inaccurate because they are incomplete. You can look at states like Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and other states and see the different numbers and they are all explained by one basic fact. Obama's problem isn't with white working class voters or rural voters. It's Appalachia.
    The post also has a convincing map of all the counties where Clinton has won over 65% of the vote. (1) #
    5/13/2008
  • David Kurtz over at Talking Points Memo has written an interesting post about post-presidential celebrity and democracy:
    One of the trappings of the [Presidency] in this day and age is the celebrity attendant to it -- and the money-making opportunities that affords...The Clintons are taking $11.4 million made as a result of being in public office and plowing it back into retaking that office...In essence, they are using the trappings of the office once out of office to get back into office. That is the sort of self-perpetuation of power that we associate with dynasties.
    (0) #
    5/12/2008
  • A short profile on Adam Chodikoff, The Daily Show's chief researcher. He's the guy that, e.g., digs up that obscure six-year-old clip used to underscore the hypocrisy of a politician's recent statement. (via fimoculous) (0) #
    4/30/2008
  • SurveyUSA has done the first 50-state poll of the election cycle to see where the Electoral College during the national election might stand. Obama beats McCain 280-258, Clinton beats McCain 276-262. Obviously, this is a poll and the election is 8 months away, so NaCl.


    (8) #
    3/6/2008
  • Dave Winer interviews George Lakoff (UC Berkeley professor of cognitive linguistics and progressive political thinker [wikipedia]) about the state of the Obama campaign, and where he should go from here. Lakoff points out his errors that led to recent losses, insightfully defines the difference between what the two candidates mean by "bipartisanship," suggests how to reach out to white low-income voters, and generally reinforces for me why I supported Obama in the first place. (via joho) (0) #
    3/6/2008
  • County conventions matter:
    U.S. Sen. Barack Obama has won 59 percent of the Washoe County convention delegates, despite having won just 51 percent of the Washoe County votes in the caucuses. U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton failed to turn out enough volunteers to fill all of the county delegate spots she won in the caucuses.
    I was one of the alternate delegates for Obama who replaced a Clinton delegate. Tomorrow, I'll write more about my day today, which included both the county convention and a Westboro Baptist protest and counter-protest. Good times. (7) #
    2/23/2008

The Clintons and political sadness

I don't want this to turn into a political blog, but I've always posted freely about American culture -- and the most dominant aspect of our culture at the moment is the recent behavior of both of the Clintons. Those who have spoken with me in the past few months about the election have heard me say that I like Hillary Clinton, that we need more people like her fighting for us, that it's important that America have a woman as president sooner than later, but that for various reasons I prefer Obama for the presidency. I usually then dive into those reasons, but I don't want to get into that here. What I do want to get into is that during the past week or so, I've felt the most political sadness since I realized that the Swift Boat attacks against John Kerry were sticking.

My sadness started when I was told by several Democrats at the Nevada caucus that they would not or might not vote for Obama because he's a crypto-Muslim. I knew that those emails have been going around, but to see people bring it up publicly underscored how widespread and widely believed the rumors are. That was a general sadness, not directed at any particular person.

But since then, my sadness has been transferred to both Bill and Hillary Clinton, whose behavior in the past week or so can only be described as "Rovian." First there was the technique of attacking and distorting one of Obama's strengths: his consistent position on the Iraq war. Lawrence Lessig of Stanford Law School describes it here, and is unafraid to call it "swiftboating." Then there's been the recent injection of Bill Clinton as the campaign attack dog, which even Robert Reich, who served as Clinton's Secretary of Labor, finds saddening. Recently, the Clinton campaign has been airing radio attack ads in South Carolina, which the Washington Post points out are deliberately misleading.

Some think that the Clinton's behavior will cause a backlash, and that Obama will benefit from all of this, as he did with Lorna Brett Howard, a former president of Chicago's chapter of NOW that switched to Obama after witnessing the Clinton campaign's distortion of Obama's record on abortion. I might have thought that a few months ago, but after what I witnessed at the caucus, I'm feeling much more pessimistic.

I think Clinton will win the nomination, and I will likely vote for her mostly for her Supreme Court nominations -- unless there's a viable 3rd party candidate that I like better -- although I question her ability to win the general election. But how Clinton's campaign is trying to get there really saddens me, and I wanted to get a bunch of links off my chest.

Thu, 01/24/2008 - 11:42am
  • Most pollsters are skipping the Nevada caucuses because they think the transient population, the newness of the early caucus date, and the nature of caucuses themselves make it too difficult to do. Having worked for a statewide campaign here, I know this to be true, but this is great: I might be able to walk into my caucus location next week without a pre-declared winner. (via political wire) (9) #
    1/11/2008
  • As happy as I am about Obama's recent surge, Harry Reid is right: the presidential nomination system is broken. I think one big primary day would be a mistake, but how about choosing four representative early primary states that changes each election? (13) #
    1/8/2008
  • It's only fair I give Huckabee some space as well. Can anyone give me an explanation of this line from his Iowa caucus victory speech last night?
    Now, ladies and gentlemen, for the same reason that our founding fathers and those before us saw what was behind us and gave it their best, I ask you to join me across Iowa and the rest of America to look out there in front of us and not to hate those, but to look behind us and to love them so much that we will do whatever it takes to make America a better country, to give our kids a better future, to give this world a better leader.
    Here's the audio clip, with credit to Air America's Rachel Maddow for highlighting this line. (4) #
    1/4/2008
  • Charles Peters:
    People who complain that Barack Obama lacks experience must be unaware of his legislative achievements... Since most of Obama's legislation was enacted in Illinois, most of the evidence is found there -- and it has been largely ignored by the media in a kind of Washington snobbery that assumes state legislatures are not to be taken seriously.
    He goes onto cite several examples from Obama's history, and ends by calling for more legislative coverage of all candidates. (Zephyr Teachout has been pushing for this as well.)

    Today is Obama-love day.
    (12) #
    1/4/2008
  • Once again, the always compelling electoral-vote.com comes alive to cover aggregate polling of the 2008 election season. I'm interested in how some polls may shift now that Obama/Huckabee have taken Iowa. (thx, jonmay) (27) #
    1/4/2008
  • PBS's NOW has an excellent interview with Zephyr Teachout -- who was the director of online organizing for Howard Dean's 2004 campaign -- about the Ron Paul phenomenon.
    There is some part of the Ron Paul story that is a little bit of expression of anger at how limited our political debate has become. The feedback for a lot of media, I think, is unfortunately very small because we spend a lot of time—or political reporters spend a lot of time—around political staff. And they have their own set of language, metrics, fundraising, and what's serious and what's not serious, and what's okay and what's not okay, and what's crazy, and what's not crazy.
    (via techpres) (22) #
    12/14/2007